Cognitive Bases of Emotions
The
James Lange Theory Cannon Bard Theory explained the emotions from the
perspective of physiological changes (internal and external). James Lange
Theory explained emotions as cause-effect relationship while Cannon Bard Theory
explained emotions as thalamus mediated simultaneous biological based
responses. The role of cognitive or mental processes was largely ignored in
dealing with emotional experiences and emotional behaviour. These theories didn’t have sufficient explanation
as how the emotional experiences are differentiated. How do we differentiate
between anger and fear, surprise and sadness (Baron, 1993) despite being having
several similar physiological reactions. The interpretation of emotions and
consequently labelling them is a cognitive activity that was missing from James
Lange & Cannon Bard theories.
These question
was answered by a new theory that was propounded by Stanley Schachter and
Jerome Singer (1962). This theory known as Cognitive Arousal Theory or Two
Factor Theory of emotions.
According
to this theory emotions have two ingredients i.e. Physical Arousal and
Cognitive Label. The emotional experiences is the result of conscious interpretation of present aroused
state in context of the cues from the immediate surrounding environment. The
Physical Arousal and Cognitive Labelling occurs at same time but prior to the
emotional experience.
We know the heart beats faster
either we are excited, frightened or angry. This is physiological aroused
state. Now the brain interpret this state considering the external
environmental cues. They suggested that emotional experience requires a
conscious interpretation of the aroused state.
Example, If a
person comes across an angry tiger, the physical arousal (increased heart rate,
respiration rate, dilation of pupil etc.) is accompanied by instant idea that
this must be scary. After this the individual experience the emotion (Cicerreli
& Meyer, 2016).
Experiment
In 1962
Schachter and Singer designed an experiment to prove that emotions are
determined by the interaction of physiological arousal and labelling of that
arousal (cognitive interpretation). The male subjects were told that they are
going to answer a questionnaire about their reactions to a new vitamin
Suproxin. They were injected with epinephrine (Adrenaline). This hormone initiates physiological arousal (Internal
Bodily Changes). The participants were divided into two groups and sent to
different rooms to fill up the questionnaire.
In one room a
confederate posing as participant displayed angry behaviour & stomped out
of the room while in another room different confederate displayed happiness.
After this, the participants were asked to describe their own emotions. As
predicted participants who observed angry behaviour labelled their
physiological arousal as anger, where as those exposed to happy situation
labelled happiness despite epinephrine being the cause of physiological arousal
having similar symptoms. This experiment vindicated that physiological arousal
has to be labelled by cognitive functionality prior to experiencing
emotion.
References:
1. NCERT, (2013). XI Psychology Text book.
2. Ciccarelli,
S. K. & Meyer, G. E. (2016). Psychology. Noida: Pearson India.
3. Baron,
R. (1993). Psychology.
4. https://explorable.com/cannon-bard-theory-of-emotion
5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMRWrrsoM-g
*******
No comments:
Post a Comment